Test-retest reliability for all exercises obtained in our setting was consistent with previous findings: ICCr: SJ O.97, CMJ 0.99, push-up 0.98, reverse grip chins 0.96, leg closed barrier 0.90, parallel dips 0.95

[50–55]. Statical analysis A one-way Anova for repeated measurements was used with significance placed at p < 0.05. When appropriate a Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare selected data. Results No significant differences in anthropometric variables or in athletic performance were detected at basal conditions before selleck screening library either experimental trial. There was a significant difference pre and post VLCKD in body weight (from 69.6 ± 7.3 Kg to 68.0 ± 7.5 Kg p < 0.05) (Figure 2a), fat mass (from 5.3 ± 1.3 Kg to 3.4 ± 0.8 Kg p < 0.001) (Figure 2b), fat percentage (pre 7.6 ± 1.4; post 5.0 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) and lean body mass percentage (from 92.4 ± 1.44 to 95.0 ± 1.0; P < 0.001) whilst there was no significant difference comparing pre and post WD. Moreover after VLCKD muscle mass

(pre 37.6 Kg ± 3.9; post 37.9 Kg ± 4.5) and lean body mass (pre 64.2 ± 6.5; post 64.6 ± 7.1) remained substantially constant (Table 4). Figure 2 Changes in body weight (a) and kilograms of fat (b) learn more before and after very low carbohydrate diet and western diet. SD are showed with bars. Table 4 Performance, anthropometric and body HKI-272 supplier composition results befor and after diet intervention   VLCKD start VLCKD end WD start WD end performance results SJ 0.42 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.05 0.41 ± 0.04 0.40 ± 0.04 CMJ 0.45 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.06 0.43 ± 0.05 reverse grip

chins 17 ± 4.2 16.6 ± 4.6 15.2 ± 3.4 15.2 ± 5.8 push-ups 36 ± 6.3 38.8 ± 4.7 37 ± 11.8 43.5 ± 18.1 legs closed barrier 19.2 ± 4.96 21.7 ± 6.35 Meloxicam 17.2 ± 5.0 16 ± 4.77 parallel bar dips 25.8 ± 8.35 28.2 ± 9.31 23 ± 12.19 27 ± 10.61 Anthropometric and body composition results muscle Kg 37.6 ± 3.9 37.9 ± 4.5 38.4 ± 4.1 38.6 ± 4.5 Fat Kg 5.3 ± 1.3 3.4 ± 0.8 ** 5.1 ± 1.3 4.9 ± 1.1 fat % 7.6 ± 1.4 5.0 ± 0.9 ** 8.0 ± 1.3 7.7 ± 1.2 Lean body mass Kg 64.2 ± 6.5 63.1 ± 7.1 61.5 ± 4.3 61.8 ± 4.6 lean body mass % 92.4 ± 1.4 95.0 ± 1.0 ** 92.0 ± 1.3 92.3 ± 1.2 Weight 69.6 ± 7.3 68.0 ± 7.5 ** 70.1 ± 6.2 70.0 ± 6.3 Data are espresse as mean and SD. Symbols: ** = p < 0.001 significant difference from baseline; * = p < 0.05 significant difference from basline. As can be seen in Table 4 there were no significant differences in any performance tests before and after VLCKD nor before and after WD. Discussion The aim of our research was to verify the effects of a VLCKD on power strength performance in elite athletes. It is well known that VLCKD’s promote weight loss very rapidly [56].