With all 10 swimmers included in the analysis, the 200 m performance times did not appear to improve with either the ACU or the CHR supplementation. Na-CIT is postulated to work predominantly as an alkalizing agent; however, more study

is needed on its intracellular effects. Lactate facilitation out of working muscle is increased under alkalotic conditions compared to placebo [5]. However, post-trial lactate concentrations were also not statistically Akt inhibitor different between trials. The literature is predominantly in agreement; lactate concentrations are significantly higher post-trial with Na-CIT ingestion compared to control or placebo [4, 11–14], even when performance outcomes were not improved with supplementation [2, 3, 29]. Therefore, a higher lactate concentration post-trial, with Na-CIT ingestion, was expected. It is well established that energy production through anaerobic glycolysis during high-intensity exercise is lower in children than adults [30, 31]. This difference has been explained by several mechanisms including reduced activity of PFK [32–35], lower activity of lactate dehydrogenase [32–35], limited ability to recruit and use type IIb motor units [34, 36], and a greater reliance on aerobic

oxidative enzymes [30, 32, 34]. Furthermore, this difference may be the reason for the smaller intramuscular pH change and lower lactate concentration found in children and adolescents after maximal exercise compared to adults [31–34, 37]. Given these age related metabolic differences we further mTOR inhibitor investigated the potential to find participants that responded to Na-CIT at a greater magnitude than others. Therefore, the data were analyzed for responders and non-responders. Responders were chosen if they had greater

than 0.4% improvement, which corresponds to a significant competitive improvement [27, 28], in the ACU versus PLC-A trials. Interestingly, the responders (n = 5) were characterized with a higher mean Thiamine-diphosphate kinase age and body size compared to non-responders, and had a 1.03% mean performance improvement, which was greater than expected and statistically significant, in the ACU but not in the CHR trial. The acid–base response was favorable post-ingestion amongst the responders. Similarly, post-trial lactate concentrations were significantly higher in the ACU trial as compared to its placebo, but not in the CHR trial. When compared to non-responders, responders had higher post-trial lactate concentrations in both the ACU and CHR trials. In fact, Na-CIT did not induce any check details ergogenic or ergolytic effect in non-responders, and they did not attain typical blood lactate concentrations after the 200 m time trials, as was observed for the responders. Therefore, those who developed higher post-trial lactate levels benefited from the acute supplementation.