To address this question, we examined the role of CR3−/− and CR4−/− in experimental cerebral malaria (ECM). We found that both CR3−/− and CR4−/− mice were fully susceptible to ECM and developed disease comparable to wild-type mice. Our results indicate that CR3 and CR4 are not critical to the pathogenesis of ECM despite their role in elimination of complement-opsonized pathogens. These findings support recent studies indicating the importance of the terminal complement pathway and the membrane

attack complex in ECM pathogenesis. Of the complement C3 receptors, 3-deazaneplanocin A ic50 only the complement receptor 1 (CR1, CD35) has an established role in the pathophysiology of malaria. CR1 serves as a host erythrocyte receptor for Plasmodium falciparum through its binding to PfRh4 (1–3), and polymorphic variants of CR1 associate with susceptibility to, and/or resistance to, severe malaria and cerebral malaria Cetuximab concentration (CM) (reviewed in (4)). By contrast, the remaining complement C3 receptors, CR2, CR3 and CR4, have poorly defined roles in the development and progression of malaria infection and CM. Based on in vitro studies, C3dg, the ligand for CR2, is generated in

large amounts and deposited on red blood cells in an alternative pathway-specific mechanism in murine malaria infections (5). The relevance of this observation to human CM remains unclear, especially in the light of studies demonstrating that coupling of C3d to malaria antigens in murine vaccine studies does not provide enhanced immunogenicity (6–8). The remaining two receptors, CR3

and CR4, are well known for their role in the phagocytosis of iC3b-opsonized pathogens (reviewed in (9–11)). However, the contribution of CR3 and CR4 to parasite killing and/or clearance via phagocytosis in both human and murine uncomplicated malaria and in CM is not known. Complement receptor 3 (a.k.a., αMβ2, CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (a.k.a., αXβ2, CD11c/CD18) are members ioxilan of the β2-integrin family of adhesion molecules that play important roles in tissue-specific homing of leucocytes during inflammation, leucocyte activation in the immune response, and phagocytosis (12–14). Both receptors bind multiple ligands and are widely expressed on all leucocytes (15), including neutrophils and macrophages that aid in clearance of malaria parasites and dendritic cells, which process antigen after ingesting parasite-infected red blood cells. The extent to which CR3 and CR4 contribute to these essential immune functions during malaria has received little attention. Instead, CR3 and CR4 are primarily used as cell surface markers to distinguish between myeloid subsets or followed for changes in expression during the course of malaria infection (16–20). Treatment with anti-CR3 antibody reportedly had no effect on the course of experimental cerebral malaria (ECM) (21,22). However, technical limitations of blocking antibody experiments require cautious interpretation as many variables affect experimental outcome (e.g.