PubMedCrossRef 23

PubMedCrossRef 23. selleck chemicals Agrusa A, Romano G, Di Buono G, Dafnomili A, Gulotta G: Laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergiences:

a 5-year experience at single centre. G Chir 2012, 33:400–403.PubMed Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions AA, RG and CD study design and writing; DVG, FG, DBG and SV data analysis and writing; GG study the design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Introduction During the past 20 years, a rapid evolution of techniques and technology has occurred for colorectal surgery. Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that laparoscopic colectomy for cancer has comparable results in terms of the long-term oncologic outcomes of conventional check details surgery [1, 2]. Moreover, a minimally invasive approach offers several advantages, such as reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, decreased morbidity, earlier bowel transit, and shorter hospital stay [1–4]. Nevertheless, laparoscopic surgery has a longer learning curve compared to traditional surgery [5–7]. In the last decade, minimally invasive colorectal surgery has been implemented by the introduction of the robotic approach that has been increasingly performed with a learning curve relatively short [8]. Right hemicolectomy has been proposed as a training procedure in order

PCI-34051 molecular weight to gain clinical experience with the robot [9]. The results of robotic surgery, in terms of oncologic outcome and anastomotic leakage, are presently comparable to laparoscopy, but with longer operating times and greater costs. Nonetheless, in high volume and experienced centers, robotic surgery is indicated for difficult cases where open surgery would most likely be indicated or

in cases where laparoscopy would have a high risk of conversion [10]. Right colon cancer rarely presents as an emergency. Usually, the most common symptoms are mild anaemia, weight loss, changes in bowel transit and STK38 palpable abdominal mass. Patients are mostly aged, with frequent co-morbidities and sometimes malnutrition. Emergency surgery for symptomatic colon cancer is usually performed with the traditional open technique, as the most common clinical scenarios (perforation, occlusion, massive bleeding) [11] do not allow for proper preparation for minimally invasive techniques. However, minimally invasive emergency colectomy performed by laparoscopy has already been described. Laparoscopy appears to offer several advantages also when performed in emergency setting, although major operative difficulties and longer operative time may represent technical drawbacks [12]. To the best of our knowledge, robotic emergency colectomy has not been previously reported in the literature. We describe the case of a patient with bleeding right colonic carcinoma who was operated by robotic surgery in urgent setting.

Comments are closed.