It has also been reported to be a prognostic factor for recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LF1160211 level 4). Similarly, in terms of preoperative evaluation, a good prognosis has been reported for patients who responded to TACE before transplantation (Note: for

brain death liver transplantation, TACE is generally performed during the waiting period) (LF1087312 level 4). Pathological vascular invasion and the degree of tumor differentiation are consistently powerful prognostic factors; however, it is virtually impossible to evaluate these factors preoperatively. From the perspective of eligibility criteria for transplantation candidates, tumor diameter and number are quite valuable as alternative markers. For the same reason, it is probably better to examine AFP, PIVKA-II and response to TACE before transplantation as factors. A recent proposal is to https://www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD1152-HQPA.html expand candidates for transplantation from the above-mentioned Milan criteria based on the results of a personal experiment (LF0006313 level 4). This is also criterion based on number and size as alternative markers, and the results of a study involving a larger number of institutions confirmed that results deteriorated due to the

expansion of candidates using this criterion (LF1205614 level 2a). Needless to say, as long as the current criteria based on number and size are used, the results will worsen with expansion of candidates. The issue regarding what extent of cancer should be included in the candidates for transplantation is not a medical concern, but rather a social problem involving the Venetoclax cell line extent to which recurrence and death due to Tacrolimus (FK506) recurrence can be accepted. CQ29 How many hepatocellular carcinoma patients are candidates for surgery or transplantation, or both? In addition, in patients who can receive both treatments, which may achieve better results, surgery or transplantation? The limited indications for hepatectomy are based on liver function factors. The indications for transplantation are also restricted based on the progression of the mass. Approximately 20–30% of patients who are candidates

for surgery or transplantation are estimated to be candidates for both. In a study taking account of mass progression during the transplantation waiting period and the time to dropout of patients, results in patients having good tumor and liver function conditions for resection candidates appeared to be equivalent or superior to those of liver transplantation. (grade B) Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma faces the significant therapeutic problem of metachronous multicentric recurrence (secondary de novo cancer) after surgery. Furthermore, hepatectomy cannot serve as a treatment for hepatitis or cirrhosis involving the background liver. Liver transplantation is a treatment that theoretically resolves these problems. There is no evaluation using an RCT (level 1b) to compare transplantation and resection as treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.