However, even at the highest concentration of 200 μg/mL, more tha

However, even at the highest concentration of 200 μg/mL, more than 80% of the cell MTT (% of control) still remained, implying that

GQDs with different functional groups possessed good compatibility and low cytotoxicity. The results indicated that different chemical modifications made little Veliparib research buy difference on the cytotoxicity of GQDs. As far as we know, many studies have shown that GO had higher cytotoxicity than GQDs [29–31]. For instance, Zhang et al. reported that the GO had obvious cytotoxicity to HeLa cells even at low concentrations [29]. The results from previous studies reported by Wang et al. showed that GO possessed higher toxicity than GQDs [30]. The reason why GQDs exhibited more biocompatibility than GO might be that they are smaller and led to less damage to cell

learn more membrane. The good biocompatibility of the three modified GQDs was not cell specific, which was evidenced by the similar results gained from the C6 cells as shown in Figure 5b. Figure 5 The MTT (% of control) Selleck CX5461 evaluated after exposed to three kinds of GQDs for 24 h. (a) MTT (% of control) of A549 cells after exposed to different concentrations of three kinds of GQDs. (b) MTT (% of control) of C6 after the exposure to three kinds of GQDs at different concentrations. Asterisk indicated p < 0.05 and double asterisk represented p < 0.01. Cell mortality analysis To provide a more comprehensive assessment of the cytotoxicity of GQDs with different functional groups, trypan blue assay was carried out to investigate the

cell mortality induced PRKD3 by the three GQDs. No obvious mortality increase was observed after treated with the three GQDs even at the concentration of 200 μg/mL. As can be seen in Figure 6a, the cell mortality constantly remained below 2% after the exposure to different concentrations of aGQDs, cGQDs and dGQDs for 24 h. No significant differences between the GQDs treated cells and the control cells (about 1%) were observed in the mortality. Similar results acquired from C6 cells, as can be seen in Figure 6b, demonstrated that the biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity of the three GQDs with different functional groups were cell nonspecific. Figure 6 The influence of GQDs with different functional groups on the mortality of cells. (a) Cell mortality of A549 cells after treated with different concentrations of three GQDs. (b) Cell mortality after exposed to different concentrations of three kinds of GQDs evaluated in C6 cell line. Asterisk indicated p < 0.05 and double asterisk represented p < 0.01. Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis or necrosis The type of cell death after exposed to the three kinds of GQDs was analyzed by double staining with annexin V-FITC and PI. Figure 7 showed the representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) images and the statistical results of apoptosis and necrosis rate assessed by FACS analysis.

Comments are closed.