,

Hercules, CA, USA). The primer pairs utilized for qPCR are shown in Table 1. The data are presented as the mean + SD and are representative of at least two independent experiments that employed at least four mice in each group, unless otherwise indicated. Data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. A value of P < 0·05 was considered significant. The administration of ES proteins to the airways induced immune cell infiltration, particularly neutrophil and lymphocyte infiltration, into the lung (Figure 1a,b). The level of IL-17 cytokines in bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) was increased profoundly after six repetitions of ES protein airway treatment, as compared with what was noted in the OVA-only treatment group (Figure 1c). In addition, the cells from the ES protein-treated Gefitinib research buy mouse lung could generate more IL-17 cytokines than those of the OVA-only treatment group (Figure 1d). The cells of the lung draining lymph node could secrete more IL-17 cytokine than those of the mesenteric lymph node cell in response to OVA re-stimulation. This finding demonstrated that the ES protein contained some molecule that could activate Th17 cells. However, we were unable to detect any difference in the spleen cells between the ES proteins and the mice treated only with OVA. In

addition, the levels of Th2 cytokines (IL-4, -5 and Buparlisib -13) were not increased after ES protein treatment (data not shown). To determine the mechanism underlying immune cell recruitment by ES proteins, we measured IL-6, CXCL1, MDC (CCL22), TARC (CCL17) and GM-CSF gene expression levels from lung epithelial cells using ELISA, real-time PCR and RT-PCR. It is well known that CXCL1 and IL-8 (CXCL8) perform a key role in the recruitment of neutrophils during lung inflammation (25). In addition, IL-17 levels are very closely related to IL-6 levels (25,26). The lung epithelial cell line (MLE12) cells could generate IL-6 and CXCL1 as a response to ES protein treatment; we also observed the same result in a study of

primary lung epithelial cells (Figure 2a). The ES proteins induced lung inflammation via the production of IL-6 and CXCL1. 5-FU In addition, The GM-CSF, TARC and MDC gene expressions in the MLE12 cells were increased by parasite ES proteins (Figure 2b). These chemokines are also related to neutrophil and T-cell and B-cell recruitment. To determine whether or not the ES protein can activate TLR, we analyzed TRIF KO and MyD88/TIRAP KO mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells after ES treatment. The ES proteins were shown to enhance the expression of IL-6 and CXCL1 in wild-type (WT) MEF, similar to what was observed in lung epithelial cells. However, we did not find that the ES protein could not enhance IL-6 and CXCL1 levels in TRIF KO MEF cells (Figure 3a,b, Supplementary Figure S1). We assessed this again with ES proteins after the administration of RNase A and C treatment to MEF cells. The results we observed, however, did not differ between the RNase-treated and nontreated samples.