Feature selleck chemicals llc selection was therefore used to further filter the metabolite signals and focus the analysis on the true differences between the two patient cohorts. P-values from the unpaired Student’s t-test were calculated for all 19 metabolites, and those

metabolites with p < 0.05 were selected. Only three metabolites (choline, valine, and creatinine) passed this filter, and the p-values, fold changes, NMR chemical shifts and multiplicities for these three metabolites are listed in Table 2. Box-plots Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of the intensity data for the three metabolites (Figure 2) indicate that choline and valine are up-regulated in HCC, while creatinine is down-regulated. Table 2 Summary of three metabolites having low p-values. Figure 2 Box-plots for three metabolite markers in all the samples of this study (HCC vs. HCV). A new PLS-DA model was built based on the three metabolites, and the cross validation prediction results are shown in Figure 3. A much better Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical result can be seen both in the classification and the ROC curve. The new AUC is 0.83, indicating that this is an improved model. A sensitivity of 80% can be obtained with a specificity of 71%, outperforming the clinical marker AFP, which has a sensitivity of 41% to 65% and specificity of 80% to Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 94% when using AFP level > 20

microg/L as the cutoff for HCC vs. HCV [35]. PCA analysis on these three markers showed some separation along PC1 as shown in Figure S7. Figure 3 PLS-DA results for the model based on 3 potential metabolite biomarkers for differentiating HCC and HCV patient samples. (a) Cross-validation predicted class values. (b) Receiver operating Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical characteristics (ROC) curve of the prediction result, with AUC … To better evaluate the robustness of this model, the same MCVV and permutation were used again, and the results can be found in Table 3. This time, the average Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical sensitivity and specificity are 71% and 73% for the true model, a significant increase over the results of the model based on 19 metabolites. As expected, the permutation results

show essentially a random old distribution (sensitivity = 54% and specificity = 39%). To better visualize the difference, the results of the MCCV procedure are plotted in Figure 4. True model results cluster towards the top-left corner of the plot, representing good sensitivity and specificity. The permutation results are spread about the center of the plot and are well separated from the true model. Table 3 Confusion matrix calculated from PLS-DA using 3 serum biomarkers for the HCC (n = 40) and HCV (n = 22) patients using 200 Monte-Carlo cross validation (MCCV) iterations. The numbers in parentheses are the results from permutation analysis. Figure 4 Results of the MCCV results (200 iterations) shown in ROC space for PLS-DA models based on the 3 metabolites used to discriminate HCC from HCV.