(C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.”
“PURPOSE: To describe a new surgical technique for a patient with cataract combined with corneal opacity.\n\nMETHODS: This technique, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, was performed on a patient with a history of corneal opacity in both eyes from childhood. Because the patient had RG-7388 inhibitor deep stromal corneal opacity, a corneal button 400-mu m

thick was made for lamellar keratoplasty while cataract surgery was performed simultaneously.\n\nRESULTS: Lifting of the flap and removal of the corneal button before cataract surgery was successful without any intraoperative complications.\n\nCONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery is a promising surgical procedure for

a cataract patient with stromal corneal opacity. [J Refract Surg. 2009;25:902-904.] doi:10.3928/1081597X-20090617-03″
“The typical response of the X-ray converter material impacted by an intense relativistic electron beam is vaporization and rapid expansion. For the Dragon-I accelerator (2.5 kA, 20 MeV, 60 ns), the slab target is replaced by a multi-foil target in order to reduce the unwanted debris ejected from the target. Comparisons of the output X-ray performance and the hydrodynamic response between the slab target and the multi-foil target are calculated by numerical methods. We found that vaporization and melt ejection dominate the hydrodynamic response in the multi-foil target while the mechanical effect plays an important role in the slab target. We also report the single-pulse experiments which measure the surface density this website decrease of the converter material after a specified delay. The experimental results show good agreement with the numerical prediction. Hydrodynamic response of the multi-foil target impacted by three successive pulses in 1 mu s is also studied by simulation. The Selleckchem Screening Library results indicate that although the surface density of the material decreases rapidly during the inter-pulse time scale, the X-ray dose produced by the second and the third pulse will nearly maintain the same as the first one. (C) 2011 Elsevier

B.V. All rights reserved.”
“In vitro gastrointestinal (GI) microbial activity in the colon compartment facilitates the arsenic release from soils into simulated GI fluids. Consequentially, it is possible that in vitro models that neglect to include microbial activity underestimate arsenic bioaccessibility when calculating oral exposure. However, the toxicological relevance of increased arsenic release due to microbial activity is contingent upon the subsequent absorption of arsenic solubilized in the GI lumen. The objectives of this research are to: (1) assess whether microbes in the in vitro small intestine affect arsenic solubilization from soils, (2) determine whether differences in the GI microbial community result in differences in the oral bioavailability of soil-borne arsenic.