Archived MT- and MA-selected isolates from 140 animals, including

Archived MT- and MA-selected isolates from 140 animals, including all 50 steers in the dietary control group (CON), and 30 steers from each of treatment groups T, TS and V, were included for further characterization. Isolates from the treatment groups were chosen by randomly selecting six of the 10 animal ID numbers from each of the 15 antibiotic-treated pens. Then, selleck chemicals from the archived collections from each of the five sampling days, isolates from only those six steers were selected for further study. In this manner, a total of 531 E. coli isolates were

identified for the analyses presented in this paper (Table 1). These comprised 55, 361 and 115 isolates selected initially on MC, MT and MA media respectively, of which 94, 99, 155, and 183 were obtained on sampling days B, C, D, and E, respectively. Table 1 Distribution of isolates characterized in this study Treatmenta Medium used for selectionb Number of animals Sampling dayc Total       STA-9090 clinical trial B C D E   CON MC 5 5 5 5 5 20   MT 50 15 19 47 30 111   MA 50 0 8 1 17 26 T MC 3 3 3 2 3 11   MT 30 12 10 27 25 74   MA 30 2 0 1 10 13 TS MC 3 3 3 3 3 12   MT 30 23 26 29 29 107   MA 30 15 14 7 15 51 V MC 3 3 3 3 3 12   MT 30 11 6 25 27 69   MA 30 2 2 5 16 25 Total     94 99 155 183 531 a Steers were fed no antibiotics (control, CON), or chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine (44 ppm; TS); chlortetracycline (11 ppm; T) or virginiamycin (31 ppm; V) administered in two discrete periods

(see Figure 1). b Isolates were collected by plating fecal slurries onto (i) MacConkey agar (MAC) containing no antibiotics (control, MC), or amended with tetracycline hydrochloride (4 μg/mL; MT) or with ampicillin (50 μg/mL; MA). c Sampling days occurred during each of the four

phases of the feeding trial (see Figure 1). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing Using the agar dilution method according to National Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [16], each isolate was tested for susceptibility to 11 antimicrobials (concentrations, μg/ml): amikacin (AMI; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64), ampicillin (AMP; 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), ceftriaxone (AXO; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64), cefoxitin (FOX; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), cephalothin (CL; 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), chloramphenicol (CHL; 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), gentamicin (GEN; 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16), nalidixic Thalidomide acid (NAL; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), streptomycin (STR; 32, 64), sulfamethoxazole (SMX; 32, 64, 128, 256, 512), and tetracycline (TE; 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 were included in the panels as controls. Determination of antimicrobial resistance breakpoints for E. coli was in accordance with CLSI guidelines [17] except for streptomycin, for which a breakpoint of 64 μg/ml was used according to [18]. These data were used to generate a resistance antibiogram (ABG) for each isolate.

Comments are closed.