In-depth qualitative interviews were undertaken

with 11 key MHRA members. A recorded semi-structured interview conducted within MHRA’s building, a topic guide (the role of pharmacists and GPs, which elements should be considered and how this should be communicated) was used to interview. A purposive sample of knowledgeable participants recruited thought a gatekeeper from different employment levels, including senior management, middle management, employees and senior employees, with knowledge of the counterfeiting medicines issue. University ethics committee approval for the overall project was gained. Framework Navitoclax supplier analysis approach was used to identify themes (2). Three main themes were identified relating to the roles of pharmacists and GPs in combating counterfeit medicines from the perspective of MHRA’s members. The first theme identified four roles for pharmacists and GPs in combating counterfeit medicines; these were: being vigilant for any suspicion of counterfeit cases; being a good source of reporting to the regulatory agency; providing selleck screening library awareness and advice for patients; as well as needing to source their medicines from a secured supply chain. The second theme related to how those roles should be communicated by the regulatory agency to pharmacists and GPs; participants recommended using media tools, working with their professional bodies and training

such as undergraduate and CPD courses. The third theme focused on what decision-makers within a regulatory agency should consider when defining those roles. Participants suggested; the regulatory agency should consider improving their communication and

speeding access to the relevant information; the need for the regulatory agency to taking patient’s confidentiality seriously in dealing with this issue; and the amount of information the agency should share with the pharmacists and GPs regarding counterfeiting medicines. This study was developed in the context of a very limited range of published Adenosine triphosphate literature. Senior and middle management MHRA managers have a clear view as to what the role of pharmacists and GPs should be in the combatting counterfeit medicines. A need to better communicate the role of pharmacists and GPs was also identified in addition to methods of delivering this. The views of the professions themselves on this are currently unknown. For the roles of pharmacists and GPs in combating counterfeit medicines to be better understood and refined, further studies are required to address the contribution and views of other stakeholders of the regulatory agency. 1. Jackson G, Patel S, Khan S. Assessing the problem of counterfeit medications in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2012;66(3):241–250. 2. Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. JOAAG. 2009;4(2):72–79. H. Family, E. Bell, V. Choo, S. Hassan, D.