97) 0.08 0.76 (0.56–1.03) 0.019* 0.66 (0.47–0.93) rs9822918 FLNB 0.27 1.19 (0.88–1.61) Smoothened Agonist 0.105 1.31 (0.95–1.81) 0.017* 1.55 (1.08–2.23) *p < 0.05 Haplotype analysis SNPs with MAF of less than 0.1 were removed from the haplotype analysis to reduce the type I error rate. Table 5 Result of haplotype association tests Gene Markers Omnibus test (adjusted p value) Haplotype-specific test Omnibus test controlling for haplotype (adjusted p value) Haplotype Frequency Adjusted p value Odds Ratio   Phenotype: lumbar spine BMDa  PTHR1 rs724448 0.02* GC 0.40 0.01* 0.59 NAc rs2242116 TT 0.59 0.02* 1.60 NAc  FLNB rs9828717 0.003* TCGT 0.29 0.04* 0.72 0.009* CCGC 0.05 0.203 1.59 0.003* rs1718456 TCGC 0.14 0.479 1.16

0.002* rs1718481 CTAC 0.39 0.083 1.30 0.005* rs1718454 TCAC 0.05 0.144 0.59 0.004* Phenotype: femoral neck BMDa  CRTAP rs4076086 0.028* GC 0.21 0.003* 0.43 0.959 rs7623768 AC 0.06 0.886 0.93 0.011* GA 0.26 0.273 1.34 0.019* AA 0.47 0.094 1.49 0.042*  PTHR1 rs724448 0.044* GC 0.40 0.031* 0.62 NAc rs2242116 TT 0.59 0.044* 1.55 NAc  FLNB rs1718456 0.031* CGT 0.29 0.121 0.77 0.042* rs1718481 CGC 0.19 0.571 PD98059 1.12 0.018* rs1718454 TAC 0.40 0.013* 1.52 0.194 CAC 0.05 0.015* 0.41 0.177 Phenotype: total hip BMDb  CRTAP rs4076086 0.015* GC 0.21 0.007* 0.44 0.217 rs7623768 AC 0.06 0.264 1.93 0.010* GA 0.27 0.127 1.57 0.017* AA 0.47 0.622 1.14 0.006*  FLNB rs1718454 0.027* CT 0.30 0.006* 1.69 0.478 rs9822918 TG 0.33 0.025* 0.66 0.127 CG 0.34 0.781 0.95 0.011* NA not applicable aAdjusted for height and weight as covariates bAdjusted for age and weight as covariates cOnly haplotypes GC and TT were observed for rs724448 and rs2242116. Both alleles of rs724448

were never observed on the same haplotypic background. In this case, the null model is identical to the alternate model, and hence, the control effect cannot be tested *p < 0.05 The global omnibus test revealed that a region rs724448–rs2242116 within the PTHR1 gene, which was in strong LD (r2 = 0.96), was significantly associated with Cetuximab research buy lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD after adjustment of height and weight (p = 0.02 and p = 0.044, respectively). FLNB showed regional associations with BMDs at all three measured skeletal sites. The region rs9828717–rs1718456–rs1718481–rs1718454 was significantly associated with lumbar spine BMD (p = 0.003). However, none of the common haplotypes are associated with lumbar spine BMD. The region rs1718456–rs1718481–rs1718454 was significantly associated with femoral neck BMD (p = 0.03). The T–A–C haplotype was associated with lower BMD status (p = 0.013, odds ratio (OR) = 1.52) while the C–A–C haplotype was associated with higher BMD status (p = 0.0145, OR = 0.41).