45 for carvedilol). Overall 46.8%, 16.5%, and 36.7% of patients had CR, PR, and NR, respectively. The baseline HVPG (mmHg) was similar in patients without and with MS: 20.1 ±4.6 vs. 18.8±4.3 (p=0.16). The median HVPG reduction was similar in patients without and with MS: −15.7% (IQR: −3.73 to −27.7) vs. −17.3% (IQR: +6.07 to − 25; p=0.26). The distribution of NSBB response was comparable between patients without or with MS: CR: 46.9% vs. 45.2% (p=0.99); PR: 17% vs. 12.9% (p=0.74);

and NR: 36.1% vs. 41.9% (p=0.66). Conclusions: The hemodynamic response rate to NSBBs in cirrhotic patients with PHT is not influenced by the presence of the metabolic syndrome. Disclosures: Simona Bota – Speaking and Teaching: Janssen Pharmaceutica, Boehringer Ingel-heim, Bristol-Myers Squibb Mattias Mandorfer – Consulting: Janssen ; Grant/Research Support: Roche, MSD; Speaking and Teaching: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers selleck products Squibb, Janssen Michael DNA Damage inhibitor Trauner – Advisory Committees or Review Panels: MSD, Janssen, Gilead, Abbvie; Consulting: Phenex; Grant/Research Support: Intercept, Falk Pharma, Albireo; Patent Held/Filed: Med Uni Graz (norUDCA); Speaking and Teaching: Falk Foundation, Roche, Gilead Markus Peck-Radosavljevic – Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Bayer, Gil-ead, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie; Consulting: Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Jennerex, Eli Lilly,

AbbVie; Grant/Research Support: Bayer, Roche, Gilead, MSD; Speaking and Teaching: Bayer, Roche, Gilead, MSD, Eli Lilly Thomas Reiberger – Grant/Research Support: Roche,

Gilead, MSD, Phenex; Speaking and Teaching: Roche, Gilead, MSD The following people have nothing to disclose: Philipp Schwabl, Petra Salzl, Arnulf Ferlitsch Background: Liver cirrhosis is often associated with diseases (portal vein thrombosis, atrial fibrillation, ischemic diseases) selleck chemicals requiring anticoagulant (AT) or antiaggregant (AA) therapy. However, one of its most severe complications is portal hypertension-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding (PH UGIB). Aims: To assess the impact of AC and AA therapy on the severity and the outcome of PH UGIB in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: From March 2012 to April 2013, 914 pts with liver cirrhosis from 59 hospitals (28 university, 31 general) were enrolled in a prospective observational study on PH UGIB (CHOC study). 147 (16.1%) were on AC and/or AA therapy at admission. Patients were classified in 4 groups: AC (n=55), AA (n=83), AC+AA (n=9), no AC/AA (control group). Results: AC patients were older and have a higher serum creatinine than control patients, but did not differ for liver function parameters except for INR (2.63 vs 1.96, p<0,004). There were no differences between the two groups for shock on admission (18 vs 24%), active bleeding at endoscopy (28 vs 39%), transfusions (70 vs 70%), failure to control bleeding (3.6 vs 7.1%), early rebleeding (24 vs 16%), 5-days-mortality (2 vs 6.1%) and 6-weeks-mortality (23.5 vs 19.5%).