0 buy Alpelisib KC866209 A. oryzae Neisseria zoodegmatis (EF4b) (3) S; SC Neisseria zoodegmatis 0.0-0.5 KC866212; KC866213; KC866295 N. zoodegmatis Oligella urethralis (2) S; SC Oligella urethralis 0.0 KC866214; KC866215 O. urethralis Pasteurella aerogenes (1) S; SI Pasteurella aerogenes

2.7 KC866226 Pasteurella sp. Pasteurella bettyae (2) S; SC Pasteurella bettyae 0.0 KC866216; KC866262 P. bettyae Pasteurella canis (1) S; SC Pasteurella canis 0.0 KC866217 P. canis Pasteurella canis (1) S; SI Pasteurella stomatis 1.6 KC866218 Pasteurella sp. Pasteurella dagmatis (1) S; SC Pasteurella dagmatis 0.2 KC866271 P. dagmatis Pasteurella multocida (14) S; SC Pasteurella multocida 0.0-0.2 KC866219; KC866220; KC866221; KC866222; KC866223; KC866263; KC866264; KC866265; KC866266; KC866267; KC866268; KC866296; KC866297; KC866298 P. multocida Pasteurella pneumotropica (1) S; SI Bisgaard Taxon 22 1.7 KC866224 Pasteurella Gemcitabine nmr sp. Pasteurella sp. (1) G; GI Necropsobacter rosorum 0.0 KC866269 N. rosorum Roseomonas sp. (1) G; GC Roseomonas mucosa 0.0 KC866225 R. mucosa 1Assignment to taxonomic level: S = species, G = genus, N = not identified. 2Correctness of assignment: SC = correct at species level, SI = incorrect at species level, GC = correct at genus level, GI = incorrect

at genus level, N = not identified. 3 Difficult differentiation of species in question by conventional tests. Table 2 Summary of identification of fastidious GNR isolates (n=158) Identification procedure % correct identification at taxonomic BIIB057 research buy level % incorrect assignment at

taxonomic level or no identification Species Genus Species Genus No identification 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis 94% (n=148) 5% (n=9) – - 1% (n=1) Conventional phenotypic methods 40% (n=64) 13% (n=21) 20% (n=31) 2% (n=3) 25% (n=39) Conventional methods mostly misidentified Moraxella spp. and Neisseria spp.; only 2 out of 24 Moraxella spp., 3 out of 10 Neisseria elongata and 1 out of 5 Neisseria weaveri, respectively, were correctly identified to species level. In contrast, results of phenotypic identification of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, Adenosine Cardiobacterium hominis, E. corrodens, Pasteurella multocida and Capnocytophaga sp. other than Capnocytophaga canimorsus were largely congruent with 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Table 3). These bacteria display biochemical key reactions that differentiate them from other fastidious GNR; e.g., a positive ornithine decarboxylase reaction and missing sugar acidification in the cystine-trypticase agar medium is typical for E. corrodens; a blood culture isolate with a positive indole reaction and a negative catalase is diagnostic for C. hominis; P. multocida has a typical pattern of acidification of sugars and a positive indole reaction and together with a history of cat bite the diagnosis is feasible [1]. C.