To conclude, findings suggest that body movements perceived as dominant were also perceived as extraverted and as unfriendly or aggressive (i.e., low agreeableness). We were not able to determine whether applause triggers “certain displays”

or “certain displays” trigger applause. Future research, therefore, should analyze whether certain behaviors occur more often after people have applauded. This could clarify the causal Trichostatin A direction of the relationship between nonverbal displays and applause. In addition, with the presented experimental set-up we were unable to reveal how verbal content and information from other communication channels are related to body motion. It is very plausible that “aggressive” body movements are coupled to an “aggressive” language that is aimed at political opponents. This also needs to be investigated in future studies. As already demonstrated in previous work, body motion RO4929097 ic50 appears to be an important nonverbal communication channel that conveys affective and social information. In the current study we found that people’s

attributions of dominance, extraversion, and agreeableness to speakers’ body movements can provide sufficient information to predict the amount of applause the speakers received throughout their entire speech. Nonverbal displays expressing qualities such as dominance might be important for those who strive for leadership positions while potential followers might benefit from easily recognizing who has the ability to be a leader. Consequently, such information of social relevance might be legible from different nonverbal and verbal communication channels including body motion. This research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P 25262-G16. “
“In Table 1, the author has misreported the correlation between attachment avoidance and difficulties in emotion regulation should be positive rather than negative (consistent with the hypotheses, the data, and the results Aspartate of the mediation analyses). The mediation analyses

are reported in the correct direction (attachment avoidance predicts greater difficulties in emotion regulation), but the typographical error in the correlation of −.38 (between attachment avoidance and difficulties in emotion regulation) should read as positive (.38). It appears that this error was overlooked by us when proofing the manuscript. The results of the manuscript hold and are correct. However, the authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The updated Table 1 is as below: “
“The periaqueductal gray area (PAG) is a mesencephalic region that integrates behavioral and cardiovascular responses in rodents (Huang et al., 2000, Jenck et al., 1989 and Nashold et al., 1969). The PAG is functionally subdivided into four longitudinal columns along its rostrocaudal axis: the dorsomedial, dorsolateral, lateral and ventrolateral columns (Bandler et al., 1991).