There is little documentation of use of IVIG as sole treatment for adenovirus. Bordigoni et al. reported lack of efficacy selleck screening library of high-dose IVIG in HSCT recipients
at high risk for disseminated disease. Given theoretical rationale and a good safety profile, we administered IVIG to both patients using a dosing regimen similar to that prescribed for BK nephropathy. In patient 2, the IVIG was also considered as treatment for her histologically documented vascular rejection. The best-tried antiviral agents for treatment of adenovirus infection include ribavirin and cidofovir although neither has been subjected to randomized, prospective trials. Ribavirin is a guanosine analogue, and while initial reports suggested in vitro anti-adenoviral activity, more recent data have shown variable results ranging from no activity to only limited activity against serotype C.[4, 17, 18] Case reports and small clinical series have also shown inconsistent results, confounded by use of concomitant additional therapies and different disease severities. Cidofovir is a cytosine nucleoside analogue that inhibits viral DNA polymerase. It demonstrates broad in vitro anti-viral activity, including against a range of adenovirus serotypes.
Clinical trials in HSCT recipients suggest favourable outcomes compared with retrospective controls.[19, 20] The find more major limiting factor associated with cidofovir administration is nephrotoxicty and its use is generally contraindicated with renal impairment. However, cidofovir is highly concentrated in urine and
renal tissue, suggesting that lower doses might be adequate for treating an infectious process localized to or originating in the kidney or lower urinary tract. This was the approach used in both of our patients. Reports exist of successful treatment with low-dose cidofovir in patients with renal impairment as a result of BK nephropathy. There is one case report of use for adenovirus infection in a dialysis-dependent patient. Alsaad et al. Reverse transcriptase administered 100 mg IV cidofovir to a kidney transplant recipient who developed renal failure as a consequence of adenovirus infection 12 years post-transplantation, with consequent improvement allowing cessation of dialysis. In conclusion, both of our patients presented with disseminated adenovirus infection at different times from their kidney transplantation and had significant clinical deterioration and successfully treated with cidofovir and IVIG. They both had well-functioning grafts at the end of the disease course. The second case, although she had concomitant rejection and viral nephropathy demonstrated the potential toxicity of cidofovir with drug induced fever and renal tubular acidosis as well as increased creatinine. These settled dramatically after cessation of the cidofovir.