, 2003 and Scrosati et al , 2011) Most published studies investi

, 2003 and Scrosati et al., 2011). Most published studies investigating the ecology of the hydrolittoral zone in the Baltic Sea proper were published several decades ago (Jansson, 1974, Haage, 1975, Hällfors et al., 1975, Jansson and Kautsky, 1977 and Wallentinus, 1979) and more recently by Salovius & Kraufvelin (2004). All these studies except the one by Haage (1975) describe summer conditions, with the first observations normally made in May. Furthermore, the studies from the 1970s can best be described as semi-quantitative: they do not meet modern requirements for statistical relevance. To date, there have been no true learn more quantitative studies describing the spring succession of the hydrolittoral

fauna in the northern Baltic proper (i.e. from March to June). As the recruitment of most macrofaunal species occurs in spring, this implies a gap in our understanding of the ecology Atezolizumab chemical structure of these habitats. It is unknown whether the abundance and biomass patterns observed on wave-exposed and wave-sheltered sites during the summer months are also valid during spring. Furthermore, to enable the identification of any future changes in the spring ecosystem, it is important to have recent information on species composition, as well as on the abundance, biomass and succession of the

flora and fauna. The aim of this study was to examine the development of community structure (qualitatively and quantitatively) on sheltered and wave-exposed shores during the spring in a part of the northern Baltic proper (Askö, Stockholm archipelago). We hypothesized that biomass and abundance would increase during the sampling period. Further, we assumed that wave action at wave-exposed sites could be considered as moderate disturbance; on the basis of theories underlying the effects of disturbance on biodiversity

formulated by Menge & Sutherland (1987), Bruno et al. (2003) and Scrosati et al. (2011), we hypothesized that the biodiversity would be higher at the exposed sites. Our counter-hypothesis was that abundance would be higher on the sheltered sites as a consequence of the greater abundance of detrivores and deposit feeders. The study was carried out in the vicinity of the Stockholm RG7420 supplier University field station at Askö Island (58°49′N, 19°39′E) in the northern Baltic proper. The area is considered to be one of the most undisturbed archipelagos in the northern Baltic proper. There is extensive sheep farming in parts of Askö; otherwise, the island is uninhabited. Houses, barns and corrals are located more than 3 km from our sites, and since there is no watercourse discharging into our study area, nutrient leaching from farmland or sewers is unlikely to have affected our results. The distance between wave-exposed and wave-sheltered sites was less than 100 m; hence, there were no potentially confounding differences in salinity and temperature. The salinity in the area fluctuates around 6 per mil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>