1a) Transcription initiation at the melR promoter is dependent o

1a). Transcription initiation at the melR promoter is dependent on activation Enzalutamide mw by CRP and is repressed by MelR binding to a single target site (denoted R) overlapping the melR transcript start. Wade et al. (2000) reported that efficient MelR-dependent repression of the melR promoter requires upstream sequences

that covered the melAB promoter and that the most important element in repression is MelR binding at target site 2. Further detailed analysis by Samarasinghe et al. (2008) showed that MelR bound at sites 1 and 1′ plays a role in repression, and images from atomic force microscopy suggested that repression is due to a nucleoprotein complex consisting of four MelR subunits and ~170 base pairs of DNA between MelR-binding

target site 2 and target site R. Most members of the AraC family of transcription regulators function as homodimers of two subunits with the N-terminal domain of each subunit involved in ligand binding and dimerization, and the C-terminal domain responsible for DNA binding (Gallegos et al., 1997). C-terminal domains of AraC family members are highly conserved, Birinapant cost carry two helix-turn-helix motifs and bind to asymmetric ~18 base pair target operator sequences. As it is well established that effective transcriptional repression can result from the two subunits of a single AraC dimer binding to two separated target sites (Schleif, 2010), and as MelR has been shown to dimerise (Bourgerie et al., 1997; Kahramanoglou et al., 2006), we revisited the E. coli DNA Damage inhibitor melibiose operon regulatory region

to investigate whether two DNA sites for MelR could be manipulated to produce efficient MelR-dependent repression of the melR promoter. In this work, we exploited the low-copy-number lac expression vector plasmid, pRW50, encoding resistance to tetracycline (Lodge et al., 1992). The starting points of the work were pRW50 derivatives carrying the TB22 and TB23 EcoRI-HindIII fragments (Fig. 1b) containing the E. coli melR promoter, as described by Samarasinghe et al. (2008). These recombinant pRW50 derivatives each carry a melR promoter::lacZ fusion, and they were propagated in the WAM1321 E. coli K-12 Δlac Δmel strain to measure melR promoter activity. Cells were grown in minimal medium with fructose, as a carbon source, and 35 μg mL−1 tetracycline, as in the study by Samarasinghe et al. (2008), and the Miller (1972) method was used to quantify β-galactosidase expression. For the different melR promoter fusions studied here in our conditions in the absence of MelR, β-galactosidase activity levels range from 360 to 400 standard Miller units. To quantify repression by MelR, cells also carried pJW15, encoding melR or empty vector, pJW15ΔmelR, and 80 μg mL−1 ampicillin was included in the media, as described by Kahramanoglou et al. (2006). In experiments to measure effects due to MalI, cells also carried pACYC–malI, encoding malI or empty vector, pACYC-ΔHN (Lloyd et al.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>